Kof15 wiki的問題，透過圖書和論文來找解法和答案更準確安心。 我們找到下列免費下載的地點或者是各式教學

國際體系研究：冷戰時期兩極體系的再檢視

為了解決Kof15 wiki的問題，作者歐莉亞 這樣論述：

In International Relations theory, the system level of analysis is one of the least studied. Although it was touched upon in a number of grand masterpieces written decades ago, there is no consensus on many key definitions. Consequently, this study attempts to clarify and operationalize neorealist

theory of international systems, and more importantly, to test it on existing international systems in ancient times and the Cold War period.The study provides an alternative vision of the Cold War era as not being a reference example of bipolarity, but rather a modern example of two unipolar coexis

ting systems. In particular, the separate analysis of economic, political, and military interactions among states that existed in different years of the Cold War period demonstrates a division between the two international systems: US-led and USSR-led, created by the structural changes that occurred

at the aftermath of the Second World War. Furthermore, the United States and the Soviet Union established unipolar orders within their respective systems based on international institutions and a network of multilateral and bilateral alliances. Both unipoles used various economic, political, and mi

litary tools to maintain the dominancy within the respective systems. Nevertheless, unlike the West system, the Soviet counterpart collapsed due to the breakup of the unipole. By studying the Cold War systems, the current study attempts to solve the puzzle why bipolarity as defined by Kenneth N. Wal

tz lasted only four decades and interprets the Soviet system’s collapse through an interaction analysis. This study hypothesizes that the structural change came from an increasing level of interactions with the outside world.Finally, the thesis attempts to offer analysis and predictions regarding th

e current system. It is under changes due to redistribution of capabilities within the West system. China’s rise in the last decade changed the capabilities’ distribution. This transition allows us to speculate that the US-led international system established after the Second World War is now challe

nged by rising powers, such as China, Russia, India, and a united Europe. This situation will probably lead to a return to multipolarity such as the one that existed before the Second World War.

台灣與南韓國家競爭優勢之比較研究:以電子競技產業為例

為了解決Kof15 wiki的問題，作者李彤嫣 這樣論述：

摘 要本論文旨在嘗試將Porter的國家競爭優勢理論與電子競技產業進行結合。論文的研究對象，除了選擇該產業中發展最為純熟的南韓來做為檢驗對象外，也將台灣的發展情勢予以檢視，目的是藉此了解彼此各自的競爭優勢條件和發展特色。除此之外，亦參酌韓國經驗與鑽石理論的策略應用，來評估我國電競產業發展的可行淺見，希冀能為國家產業發展的學術研究領域提供不同的分析視野。根據整體研究所獲之研究發現：一、韓國電競產業當前以國際化做為發展標的，且產業政策規劃已趨近成熟；台灣電競產業則進入中期發展階段，期望產業開始回收市場投入成本。但未來市場內需不足、新遊戲的威脅、政府與媒體的部分仍為其挑戰；二、台灣電競產業發展雖然

較晚，卻能在「生產要素」與「企業策略、產業結構、同業競爭」此兩大要素與南韓平分秋色，且全球競爭力指數(GCI)中的效能增進與創新兩項皆優於韓國的環境。而韓國的競爭優勢則在於政府積極的態度、資源集中投入、執行績效與政策的詳細程度；三、鑽石理論在經由產業性質差異的調整之後，亦能發揮透視整體電競產業鏈研究的分析與解釋能力，且其理論內涵與策略應用至今仍具參考價值。