Walsh construction的問題，透過圖書和論文來找解法和答案更準確安心。 我們找到下列免費下載的地點或者是各式教學

Islamophobia and Radicalization: Breeding Intolerance and Violence

為了解決Walsh construction的問題，作者Esposito, John L. (EDT)/ Iner, Derya (EDT) 這樣論述：

While the themes of radicalization and Islamophobia have been broadly addressed by academia, to date there has been little investigation of the crosspollination between the two. Is Islamophobia a significant catalyst or influence on radicalization and recruitment? How do radicalization and Islamopho

bia interact, operate, feed one another, and ultimately pull societies toward polar extremes in domestic and foreign policy? The wide-ranging and global contributions collected here explore these questions through perspectives grounded in sociology, political theory, psychology, and religion. The vo

lume provides an urgently needed and timely examination of the root causes of both radicalization and Islamophobia; the cultural construction and consumption of radical and Islamophobic discourses; the local and global contexts that fertilize these extreme stances; and, finally, the everyday Muslim

in the shadow of these opposing but equally vociferous forces. John L. Esposito is University Professor, Professor of Religion & International Affairs, Professor of Islamic Studies, Founding Director of the Alwaleed Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding at the Walsh School of Foreign Service,

and Director of The Bridge Initiative at Georgetown University, USA.Derya Iner is Senior Lecturer and Research Coordinator at the Centre for Islamic Studies, Charles Sturt University, Australia. Her research interests include contemporary issues related to Islam and Islamic cultures.

The Soviet Gulag: Evidence, Interpretation, and Comparison

為了解決Walsh construction的問題，作者David-Fox, Michael (EDT) 這樣論述：

Before the collapse of the Soviet Union and the subsequent archival revolution, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn's famous "literary investigation" The Gulag Archipelago was the most authoritative overview of the Stalinist system of camps. But modern research is developing a much more thorough and nuanced unde

rstanding of the Gulag. There is a greater awareness of the wide variety of camps, many not isolated in far-off Siberia; prisoners often intermingled with local populations. The forced labor system was not completely distinct from the "free" labor of ordinary Soviet citizens, as convicts and non-pri

soners often worked side-by-side. Nor was the Gulag unique when viewed in a global historical context. Still, the scale and scope of the Soviet Gulag was unprecedented. Intrinsic to Stalinist modernization, the Gulag was tasked with the construction of massive public works, scientific and engineerin

g projects, and such mundane work as road repairs. Along with the collectivization of agriculture, the Soviet economy (including its military exertions in World War II) was in large part dependent on compulsory labor. The camp system took on an outsized economic significance, and the vast numbers of

people taken in by zealous secret police were meant to fulfill material, not just political, goals. While the Soviet system lacked the explicitly dedicated extermination camps of its Nazi counterpart, it did systematically extract work from inmates to the verge of death then cynically "released" th

em to reduce officially reported mortality rates. In an original turn, the book offers a detailed consideration of the Gulag in the context of the similar camps and systems of internment. Chapters are devoted to the juxtaposition of nineteenth-century British concentration camps in Africa and India,

the Tsarist-era system of exile in Siberia, Chinese and North Korean reeducation camps, the post-Soviet penal system in the Russian Federation, and of course the infamous camp system of Nazi Germany. This not only reveals the close relatives, antecedents, and descendants of the Soviet Gulag--it shi

nes a light on a frighteningly widespread feature of late modernity. Overall, The Soviet Gulag offers fascinating new interpretations of the interrelationship and importance of the Gulag to the larger Soviet political and economic system, and how they were in fact parts of the same entity. Michael

David-Fox is professor at the Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service and the Department of History, Georgetown University. He is the author of Crossing Borders: Modernity, Ideology, and Culture in Russia and the Soviet Union; Showcasing the Great Experiment: Cultural Diplomacy and Western Visito

rs to the Soviet Union, 1921-1941; and Revolution of the Mind: Higher Learning among the Bolsheviks, 1918-1929. David-Fox is also coeditor of Fascination and Enmity: Russia and Germany as Entangled Histories, 1914-1945 and The Holocaust in the East: Local Perpetrators and Soviet Responses.

大學生不安全依附傾向對分手後自我概念清晰之效果研究：以自我擴張、自我驗證為中介變項

為了解決Walsh construction的問題，作者吳俊逸 這樣論述：

鑒於失戀為大學生常見的議題，以及伴隨而來的自我概念混淆和憂鬱皆是失戀時常帶來的困境，然而，親密關係對個人自我概念的改變以及失戀如何影響個人自我概念的相關研究甚少，且與親密關係息息相關的依附理論，在失戀影響自我概念的歷程中扮演的角色更是缺乏進一步的探討。因此，本研究結合「焦慮型依附」與「逃避型依附」兩種不安全依附類型，以及「自我擴張」、「自我驗證」兩種關係中的自我概念改變歷程，提出「不同依附傾向之自我概念改變歷程對分手後自我概念清晰度影響之模式」，探討以下議題：(1)「焦慮型依附」、「逃避型依附」對分手後「自我概念清晰」之預測效果；(2)「自我擴張」與「自我驗證」兩種自我概念改變歷程於前述預測

關係中的中介效果。為了檢驗本研究之模式，本研究採用網路問卷，測量大學生之依附傾向、關係中的自我擴張、自我驗證經驗以及分手後之自我概念清晰。參與者為336位大專院校學生(男性111人，女性225人)。驗證性因素分析與信度分析結果顯示，本研究各分量表之信效度皆可接受。結構方程模式分析結果顯示：(1)「焦慮型依附」負向預測「自我擴張」與分手後「自我概念清晰」；(2)「逃避型依附」負向預測「自我驗證」；(3)「自我擴張」負向預測分手後「自我概念清晰」。本研究之結果對於親密關係失落的理論或實務皆有參考價值。