Reallocate的問題，透過圖書和論文來找解法和答案更準確安心。 我們找到下列免費下載的地點或者是各式教學

On Capitalism and Inequality: Progress and Poverty Revisited

為了解決Reallocate的問題，作者Ayres, Robert U. 這樣論述：

Capitalism is under attack. Defenders say that capitalism has raised billions of people from poverty. But a central activity of capitalism today, Wall Street style, is speculation (gambling), using other people's money, and privatizing the profits while socializing the debts. Skeptics argue that cap

italism has redistributed the wealth of the planet in favor of a very few, meanwhile leaving the planet in bad shape and leaving billions of people out in the cold. Wealth is now extremely mal-distributed, opportunity is far from equal, and upward social mobility has declined significantly in recent

decades. This book reviews the evidence and arguments pro and con in considerable detail.The evidence is mixed. The main virtue of capitalism is its emphasis on competition as a driver of innovation and, thus, of economic growth. It is true that economic growth has accelerated in recent centuries,

and it is true that billions of people have been lifted from poverty. But it is not necessarily true that intense "winner take all" competition in the marketplace is the explanation for growth. Neoclassical economic theory posits that self-interest is the primary motive for all economic decisions, l

eaving little room for cooperation and even less for altruism. The theory applies to an unrealistic "model" of human behavior, known as Homo economicus or "economic man", whose characteristic activity is buying or selling.The reason for using the adjective word "social" - as in socialism" or "social

service" or "social democracy" -- is, essentially, to deny those postulates of standard economic theory. Real humans are not rational utility maximizers (whatever that is) and very often do things that are not in their own personal best interests. This can happen because other interests, such as fa

mily loyalty, professional, religious, or patriotic duty, may take precedence. Real people rarely behave like Homo economicus, who has rivals but no friends. He (or she) does not trust anyone, hence cannot cooperate with others, and can never create, or live in, a viable social system (or marriage).

Yet social systems, ranging from families and tribes to firms, cities, and nations do (and must) exist or civilization cannot exist. A viable social system must not allow "winner takes all". It must reallocate some of the societal wealth being created by competitive activities to support the young,

the old and the weak, because all of those people have equal rights, if not the same luck or the same skills.Both competition and cooperation have important roles to play. A hybrid capitalism involving both is the only viable solution. The book ends with a specific suggestion, namely Universal Basi

c Income, or UBI. Professor Ayres holds a PhD in Mathematical Physics from Kings College, University of London, a MSc in Physics from the University of Maryland and a BA, BSc from the University of Chicago. He is currently Emeritus Professor of Economics and Political Science and of Technology and

Operations Management at INSEAD, the international graduate business school.He joined INSEAD in 1992, becoming the first Novartis Chair of Management and the Environment, as well as the founder of CMER, Center for the Management of Environmental Resources. He directed CMER from 1992-2000. Since ret

irement he has been a visiting professor at Chalmers Institute of Technology in Sweden (where he was also a King’s Professor) and Institute Scholar at the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) in Austria, He remains active, producing publications on topics ranging from Industr

ial Metabolisms and Industrial Ecology, through Environmental Policy and Environmental Economics, to Energy. Professor Ayres is the author or coauthor of 21 books, most recently including The Economic Growth Engine (2009, with Benjamin Warr), Crossing the Energy Divide (2009, with Edward Ayres) and

The Bubble Economy (2014).

Reallocate進入發燒排行的影片

考量內生性生產要素與非意欲產出問題下探討CSR活動對銀行業經濟效率之影響

為了解決Reallocate的問題，作者邱義晃 這樣論述：

隨著經濟成長與環境變遷，企業經營開始注重環境、社會和公司治理(ESG)，本文針對這個議題，探討企業社會責任投入對銀行業經濟效率之影響，CSR資料取自EIRIS之2003-2014年32個國家287家銀行，要素投入與產出數據取自Bureau Van Dijk公司之ORBIS Bank Focus全球銀行與金融分析資料庫，利用隨機邊界方法考慮生產要素內生性與非意欲產出，同時探討技術與配置效率議題。採用Amsler, Prokhorov and Schmidt (2016)工具變數法解決要素內生性問題，確保迴歸係數估計值具備一致性，實證結果顯示總成本無效率主要來自配置無效率，而非技術無效率，此發現

與銀行業常進行組織結構改造，重新調整人力、資本與資金等以改善配置無效率相呼應一致。進一步將技術和總無效率與環境變數連結，包括(1)前五大銀行市占率、(2) 銀行成立年數、(3)CSR員工項目分數、(4)資產報酬率、(5)淨值資產比、(6) CSR公司治理分數、(7)銀行資產/GDP比、(8)人均GDP等8個環境變數，其中前三項主要影響技術無效率因素，結果發現環境變數確實影響銀行經營效率，擬定執行經營策略納入考慮有其重要性。並將研究資料依年份期間與洲別分類，發現2007-2009年次貸風暴期間銀行經營效率最低，但三個期間的差異未達統計顯著；洲別分類以亞洲銀行經營效率最低，檢定發現歐洲與美洲銀行經

營效率顯著高於亞洲銀行，研判與亞洲銀行種族文化、經濟環境與規模差異較大有關。文中比較不考慮(1)內生性、(2) CSR與(3)非意欲產出對經營效率之影響，發現造成技術無效率與配置無效率誤置，導致銀行經營者執行錯誤的經營策略方向，反而造成資源更多的浪費，評估銀行經營效率的影響因素必須充份完整，不得不慎。

Paying for the Past: The Case Against Prior Record Sentence Enhancements

為了解決Reallocate的問題，作者Roberts, Julian V./ Frase, Richard S. 這樣論述：

All modern sentencing systems, in the US and beyond, consider the offender's prior record to be an important determinant of the form and severity of punishment for subsequent offences. Repeat offenders receive harsher punishments than first offenders, and offenders with longer criminal records ar

e punished more severely than those with shorter records. Yet the vast literature on sentencing policy, law, and practice has generally overlooked the issue of prior convictions, even though this is the most important sentencing factor after the seriousness of the crime. In Paying for the Past, Rich

ard S. Frase and Julian V. Roberts provide a critical and systematic examination of current prior record enhancements under sentencing guidelines across the US. Drawing on empirical data and analyses of guidelines from a number of jurisdictions, they illustrate different approaches to prior record e

nhancements and the differing outcomes of those approaches. Roberts and Frase demonstrate that most prior record enhancements generate a range of adverse outcomes at sentencing. Further, the pervasive justifications for prior record enhancement, such as the repeat offender's assumed higher risk of r

eoffending or greater culpability, are uncertain and have rarely been subjected to critical appraisal. The punitive sentencing premiums for repeat offenders prescribed by US guidelines cannot be justified on grounds of prevention or retribution. Shining a light on a neglected but critically importan

t topic, Paying for the Past examines the costs of prior record enhancements for repeat offenders and offers model guidelines to help reduce racial disparities and reallocate criminal justice resources for jurisdictions who use sentence enhancements.

台中十期重劃區雙併別墅之開發策略

為了解決Reallocate的問題，作者呂承翰 這樣論述：

市地重劃係依照都市計畫規劃內容，將一定區域內，畸零細碎不整之土地，按原有位次交換分合為形狀方整的各宗土地後，重新分配予原土地所有權人的行政措施，市地重劃之目的主要在於促進都市整體建設發展及提高土地經濟價值，藉由重劃開發無償取得公共設施用地，節省政府支出，提升市民生活品質。近年來科技大廠南遷設廠牽動了就業與居住人口流動，台中新興重劃區未來的發展性，使台中在地建商獵地，也使北部品牌建商更揮軍台中搶市。根據市地重劃的土地使用分區規定，不同的重劃區呈現出的市容樣貌以及建築型態也會有所不同，本研究旨在探討台中十期重劃區雙併別墅的開發策略，使用SWOT分析十期重劃區以及相同開發條件的重劃區，並選定兩位在

十期重劃區皆有推案的建設公司之專業人士作為研究對象，進行深度訪談，從中建構其商業模式。綜合以上論述，歸納出研究結果如下：1.本區目標客群為中小型企業主、退休族群、喜歡大自然的客戶 2.疫情升溫加上台商回流，客戶對於雙併別墅的需求提高，建商可結合十期的地理優勢，設計在都市熱島效應外圍的綠意建築，將是未來開發本區的一大策略。