constitutional right的問題，透過圖書和論文來找解法和答案更準確安心。 我們找到下列免費下載的地點或者是各式教學

Punishment Without Trial: Why Plea Bargaining Is a Bad Deal

為了解決constitutional right的問題，作者Byrne Hessick, Carissa 這樣論述：

From a prominent criminal law professor, a provocative and timely exploration of how plea bargaining prevents true criminal justice reform and how we can fix it--now in paperback When Americans think of the criminal justice system, the image that comes to mind is a trial-a standard court­room scene

with a defendant, attorneys, a judge, and most important, a jury. It’s a fair assumption. The right to a trial by jury is enshrined in both the body of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. It’s supposed to be the foundation that undergirds our entire justice system. But in Punishment Without Tr

ial: Why Plea Bargaining Is a Bad Deal, University of North Carolina law professor Carissa Byrne Hessick shows that the popular conception of a jury trial couldn’t be further from reality. That bed­rock constitutional right has all but disappeared thanks to the unstoppable march of plea bargaining,

which began to take hold during Prohibition and has skyrocketed since 1971, when it was affirmed as constitutional by the Supreme Court. Nearly every aspect of our criminal justice system encourages defendants-whether they’re innocent or guilty-to take a plea deal. Punishment Without Trial showcase

s how plea bargaining has undermined justice at every turn and across socioeconomic and racial divides. It forces the hand of lawyers, judges, and defendants, turning our legal system into a ruthlessly efficient mass incarceration machine that is dogging our jails and pun­ishing citizens because it’

s the path of least resistance. Professor Hessick makes the case against plea bargaining as she illustrates how it has damaged our justice system while presenting an innovative set of reforms for how we can fix it. An impassioned, urgent argument about the future of criminal justice reform, Punishm

ent Without Trial will change the way you view the criminal justice system. Carissa Byrne Hessick is the Ransdell Distinguished Professor of Law at the University of North Carolina School of Law, where she also serves as the director of the Prosecutors and Politics Project. Previously, she taught

at the law schools of Arizona State, Harvard, and the University of Utah. Her work on the criminal justice system has been published by the Los Angeles Times, the Philadelphia Inquirer, Slate, and numerous academic journals. She lives in Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

constitutional right進入發燒排行的影片

死刑以外，生刑之極－終身刑之研究

為了解決constitutional right的問題，作者呂欣恬 這樣論述：

隨著世界上越來越多國家相繼廢除死刑，終身刑(Life Sentences，或稱Life Imprisonment)成為死刑以外最為嚴厲之刑罰，在國際上亦被廣泛使用。過往，我國對於終身刑之討論大多聚焦於是否以此作為死刑之替代刑，然而終身刑之本質，及其適用與影響卻甚少被重視。有鑑於此，本文擬以終身刑為研究重點，就其源起、定義、類型，以及比較法上適用概況為介紹，並就我國是否要增訂無假釋終身刑，以及現行無期徒刑有關規定可能致生之問題為討論。

Religious Liberty and the American Founding: Natural Rights and the Original Meanings of the First Amendment Religion Clauses

為了解決constitutional right的問題，作者Muñoz, Vincent Phillip 這樣論述：

＂The Founders understood religious liberty to be an inalienable natural right. Vincent Phillip Muñoz explains what this means for church-state constitutional law, uncovering what we can and cannot determine about the original meanings of the First Amendment’s Religion Clauses and constructing a n

atural rights jurisprudence of religious liberty.＂--

女性夜間工作法規探討-從司法院釋字第807解釋出發

為了解決constitutional right的問題，作者談士傑 這樣論述：

現今社會，不斷的強調性別帄等，並努力提升女性工作、教育以及經濟的地位。然而，我國勞基法第 49 條僅僅規範了女性從事夜間工作的限制。使得公司在僱用女性員工從事輪班工作遭遇困難，並且造成女性勞工在尌業環境上，面臨歧視。而在民國 110 年 8 月 20 日，司法院做出釋字 807 號，認定 49 條違憲之後，對於女性從事夜間工作是要全面開放還是有所保護尌需要重新檢討。本文從歷年來的判決，司法院釋字 807 號、聯合國對於婦女地位提升的看法、美國日本對於女性夜間工作的發展背景及現況、我國相關的法律、憲法帄等權的實質意義及夜間工作對輪班人員身體健康的影響等來探討女性夜間工作，期望能給予未來修法的方

向及建議。